Most research security processes were built to get the job done, not to survive an audit. This session is about closing that gap.
Webinar details
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Time: 1:00 PM ET | 10:00 AM PT
Duration: 60 minutes (including Q&A)
What you will learn
NSPM-33 isn’t getting simpler, and the expectation that universities can demonstrate their due diligence — not just describe it — is now table stakes. The problem is that most research security workflows weren’t designed with that in mind. They were designed by one or two people who knew what they were doing, and held together ever since by institutional memory and a lot of spreadsheets.
The best way to know whether your process would hold up under real scrutiny is to see what a stronger one looks like. Heidi Becker, Product Manager for Dimensions Research Security, will show you the platform in action. You’ll see researcher screening from first flag to clearance, consistent review criteria applied across cases, and reports that give auditors exactly what they need, without any additional explanation.
If your team is managing research security reviews across disconnected tools and hoping the documentation holds up, this session is worth an hour of your time.
You’ll come away understanding:
- How to build a review workflow your whole team can follow — not just the person who designed it
- What consistent, repeatable screening looks like when it’s built into the platform rather than recreated each time
- How to produce reports that give auditors and leadership the context they need, without additional explanation
Speakers
